GraphQL is a query language that provides flexible data retrieval, while REST uses predefined endpoints.
Both GraphQL and REST are approaches to building APIs, but they solve problems differently. Understanding their trade-offs helps you make informed architectural decisions.
REST: Multiple fixed endpoints, each returning a predefined structure. To get user data with their posts, you might need:
GET /users/123 → Returns user details
GET /users/123/posts → Returns their posts
GET /posts/456/comments → Returns comments on a post
GraphQL: Single endpoint where clients specify exactly what they need:
{
user(id: "123") {
name
email
posts {
title
comments { text }
}
}
}
One request gets everything, structured exactly as needed.
No related topics found.
Simplicity: REST is conceptually simpler. HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) map directly to CRUD operations. Any developer can understand it quickly.
Caching: HTTP caching works beautifully with REST. GET requests can be cached by browsers, CDNs, and intermediary proxies automatically. GraphQL caching requires custom implementation.
File Uploads: Handling file uploads is straightforward in REST. In GraphQL, it requires additional complexity or using REST endpoints alongside GraphQL.
Public APIs: For public-facing APIs where you control the data structure and clients have predictable needs, REST's simplicity is often better.
Real-World REST Example: Stripe's payment API is REST-based. It's simple, well-documented, and cacheable. Most use cases involve straightforward CRUD operations where REST excels.
Flexible Data Requirements: Mobile apps often need different data than web apps. GraphQL lets each client request exactly what it needs without creating multiple API versions.
Reducing Over-fetching: REST might return 50 fields when you only need 5. On mobile networks with limited bandwidth, this wastes data and slows down the app.
Avoiding Under-fetching: Instead of making 5 REST calls to assemble a dashboard, one GraphQL query gets everything.
Rapid Frontend Development: Frontend teams can iterate quickly without waiting for backend to create new endpoints for every requirement.
Real-World GraphQL Example: GitHub switched to GraphQL because different integrations needed vastly different combinations of data. Their REST API required multiple calls, while GraphQL enables complex queries in a single request.
GraphQL Complexity:
Requires learning a new query language
Query depth limiting needed to prevent abuse
Caching strategies are more complex
Error handling is less standardized
N+1 query problems need solving (DataLoader pattern)
REST Complexity:
API versioning for breaking changes
Managing many endpoints as applications grow
Over-fetching wastes bandwidth
Multiple round trips affect performance
Many companies use both:
REST for simple CRUD operations and file uploads
GraphQL for complex queries and flexible data needs
Netflix, for example, uses REST for content delivery and metadata, but GraphQL for their complex discovery and recommendation features.
Choose REST when:
Building simple CRUD APIs
Caching is critical for performance
Team has limited GraphQL experience
Public API for third-party developers
Choose GraphQL when:
Multiple clients with different data needs (web, mobile, IoT)
Frequent frontend iterations
Complex, deeply nested data relationships
Team is comfortable with the added complexity
GraphQL can be faster (fewer requests) or slower (complex resolver logic) depending on implementation. Proper caching, DataLoader for batching, and query complexity analysis are essential.
REST performance is predictable and well-understood, with decades of optimization knowledge and tooling.
Most applications start with REST due to simplicity. As complexity grows and data requirements diversify, GraphQL becomes attractive. The decision isn't binary - evaluate based on your specific use case, team expertise, and scaling requirements.
Both are tools in your toolkit. Understanding their strengths helps you choose appropriately rather than following trends blindly.