Learn the four isolation levels that control how transactions interact with each other
Explore the dangerous world where transactions can see changes that haven't been committed yet - including changes that might be rolled back!
Save
Discover how Read Committed always shows you the latest committed truth, even if it means changing its story mid-transaction.
Save
Read Uncommitted is like that friend who tells you every rumor they hear, even the ones that turn out to be completely false!
This isolation level allows your transaction to see uncommitted changes from other transactions. This creates the infamous "dirty read" problem:
-- Transaction 1 starts
SELECT price FROM products WHERE id = 1; -- Gets $100
-- Transaction 2 updates price to $50 (but doesn't commit)
SELECT price FROM products WHERE id = 1; -- Gets $50
-- Transaction 2 ROLLBACK! (The change was a mistake)
-- You made decisions based on $50, but the real price is $100!
The Risk: You might process data that gets rolled back, leading to decisions based on information that never actually existed!
Key Insight: Read Uncommitted gives you maximum speed but minimum reliability - like getting news from social media instead of verified sources.
Unlike Repeatable Read's consistent story, Read Committed is like an honest witness who always tells you the latest committed truth, even if it contradicts what they said earlier.
This creates an interesting phenomenon: within the same transaction, you might read the same row twice and get different values!
-- Transaction 1
SELECT balance FROM accounts WHERE id = 123; -- Gets $1000
-- Transaction 2 commits: balance becomes $500
SELECT balance FROM accounts WHERE id = 123; -- Gets $500
This happens because Read Committed always reads the latest committed value, regardless of what it showed you before.
Key Insight: Read Committed trades consistency for freshness - you always get the latest committed data, but your transaction might see an inconsistent view of the world.
Discover the chaos that happens when multiple operations try to modify the same data at once, and how databases solve this problem.
Save
Meet the four isolation levels that determine how much transparency transactions have over each other.
Save
Experience how repeatable read creates a consistent snapshot of data that never changes during your transaction.
Save
Imagine you and your friend are both editing the same Google Doc at the exact same time. You're typing in paragraph 1 while they're deleting paragraph 2. Without proper coordination, you'd end up with a complete mess!
face this exact problem every millisecond. Multiple transactions (think of them as different users) are constantly reading and writing data simultaneously. Without proper rules, your bank account could show different balances to different people at the same time!
This is where properties come to the rescue. The 'I' in ACID stands for Isolation - it's like having traffic rules for database transactions.
Key Insight: Isolation levels are like traffic lights for your database - they control when transactions can 'go' and what they're allowed to 'see' while other transactions are running.
Just like security clearance levels in spy movies, have four standard isolation levels that determine what each transaction can see:
š SERIALIZABLE - The Fort Knox level (strictest) š REPEATABLE READ - The consistent storyteller ā READ COMMITTED - The honest but flexible friend ā” READ UNCOMMITTED - The gossip who shares everything
Each level trades off between performance (how fast things run) and consistency (how accurate the data appears). The stricter the isolation, the slower the database, but the more predictable the results.
Key Insight: Choosing an isolation level is like choosing between speed and accuracy - you can't always have both at maximum levels!
Imagine reading a newspaper that magically updates its content while you're reading it. Confusing, right? Repeatable Read prevents this chaos by giving you a personal time capsule.
Here's the magic: When your transaction first reads a row, Repeatable Read takes a 'snapshot' of that moment. No matter how many other transactions modify that data and commit their changes, your transaction will always see the same value when you read it again.
-- Transaction 1 starts
SELECT name FROM users WHERE id = 1; -- Gets 'Alice'
-- Transaction 2 updates and commits: Alice ā Bob
SELECT name FROM users WHERE id = 1; -- Still gets 'Alice'!
Key Insight: Repeatable Read is like having your own personal version of reality - consistent and unchanging throughout your entire transaction, no matter what chaos happens around you.
Meet the strictest isolation level that treats your database like there's only one user at a time, ensuring perfect consistency at the cost of performance.
Save
Serializable is like having a strict librarian who only allows one person to read each book at a time - no exceptions!
When your transaction reads a row in Serializable mode, it's not just reading - it's locking. Other transactions can't even read that same row until you're completely done.
-- Transaction 1 (Serializable)
SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = 1; -- Locks the row
-- Transaction 2 tries to read the same row
SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = 1; -- WAITS... and waits...
-- Transaction 1 commits
-- Only now Transaction 2 gets its result!
The Trade-off: Perfect consistency but terrible performance.
It's like having a highway where only one car can drive at a time.
Key Insight: Serializable eliminates all issues by essentially eliminating concurrency itself - transactions run as if they're the only one in the .
Understand how to choose the right isolation level by balancing performance, consistency, and the types of problems you're willing to accept.
Save
Learn when to use each isolation level through practical scenarios that every developer faces.
Save
Choosing an isolation level is like choosing a superpower - each comes with strengths and weaknesses:
šļø Performance Ranking (Fastest to Slowest):
š”ļø Consistency Problems They Solve:
The Golden Rule: Higher isolation = More consistency + Less performance
Key Insight: There's no 'best' isolation level - only the right level for your specific use case. Banking systems need Serializable, social media feeds can work with Read Uncommitted.
Let's match isolation levels to real-world scenarios:
š¦ Banking Transactions ā SERIALIZABLE Why? Money can't appear or disappear due to race conditions. Perfect accuracy required.
š Analytics Dashboard ā READ COMMITTED Why? You want recent data but can tolerate slight inconsistencies between different charts.
š± Social Media Feed ā READ UNCOMMITTED Why? Speed matters more than seeing the absolute latest likes/comments. Near-real-time is good enough.
š Financial Reports ā REPEATABLE READ Why? All numbers in the report must be from the same point in time for consistency.
Pro Tip: Most applications use Read Committed as the default because it provides a good balance between performance and consistency.
Key Insight: The 'right' isolation level depends on whether your application values speed, accuracy, or consistency more - and that depends on what you're building!